Texas Suspends Porn Site Domain Over Age-Verification Violations

Domain owner must post $9.14 million bond to regain suspended domain

depiction of suspended adult website

The State of Texas has leveraged its age verification statute to secure a court order requiring .com registry operator Verisign to suspend a domain tied to an adult website. The suspension follows a civil enforcement action brought by the Texas Attorney General and imposes a significant financial condition on the domain owner for any attempt to recover the site.

Texas law requires websites that distribute “sexual material harmful to minors” to implement age verification beyond a simple checkbox. Under the statute, sites must either collect a government-issued ID from users or use an approved age verification service or comparable technology to confirm that visitors are adults. The law aims to prevent minors from accessing explicit content and holds website operators accountable for compliance.

In April 2024, Attorney General Ken Paxton filed suit against Kick Online Entertainment in connection with one of its sites. According to court filings, the company did not respond to the lawsuit. As the case advanced, the court issued a writ directing Verisign, the registry for .com domains, to suspend the domain name used by the site at issue.

The court order conditions any petition to restore the domain on the posting of a $9.14 million bond. That bond must guarantee that the site will implement age verification practices that comply with Texas law and will satisfy the civil penalties previously awarded in the case. The amount reflects the court’s assessment of compliance risk and the need to ensure enforcement of the state’s regulatory requirements.

This outcome represents an uncommon use of state enforcement authority to compel a registry operator to take action against a domain. Domain suspension by a registry usually follows court orders in cases involving illegal content, trademark disputes, or clear violations of law. In this instance, the suspension stems from alleged failures to meet the legal standards for preventing minor access to explicit material.

The Attorney General’s office publicly announced the court victory. The announcement emphasized the state’s commitment to protecting minors from online sexual content and enforcing the specific requirements of Texas’ age verification statute. The office framed the suspension and bond requirement as a meaningful remedy to address alleged noncompliance.

Industry observers note that the decision could set a precedent for how states enforce age verification rules against online platforms and domain holders. Requiring a multi-million-dollar bond as a precondition for domain recovery raises questions about proportionality, the practical ability of operators to comply, and the potential for similar measures in other jurisdictions that adopt strict age verification regimes.

Legal experts also point out potential First Amendment and due process issues that may arise if domain suspensions become more common as an enforcement tool. Challenges could focus on whether registry-ordered suspensions disproportionately restrict speech, the adequacy of procedural safeguards, or the technical and privacy implications of the age verification methods mandated by law.

For the domain owner, the path to regaining the site is straightforward in principle but difficult in practice: post the prescribed bond, implement compliant age verification, and satisfy any monetary judgments. For regulators and online service providers, the case underscores the need to evaluate age verification technologies, privacy protections for verified users, and the operational feasibility of meeting state-specific mandates while serving a global audience.

Public commentary around the enforcement action has included attention to the timing of the Attorney General’s announcement. Media reports noted the office released the update while Paxton was reported to be traveling abroad. The core legal outcome, however, remains the court-ordered suspension and the requirement that the domain owner secure a $9.14 million bond to restore the site under compliant conditions.