Reglikedomain industry desk

Thinks BabyBoom.com is cybersquatting — Advertising firm

Firm files UDRP against common term.

You can’t make this stuff up.

A marketing firm that helps people target fresh parents under the name Babyboom has filed a UDRP against the domain name BabyBoom.com.

European firm N2COM offers services under the Babyboom name and apparently thinks this is a creative and unique use of the term baby boom. ‘Cause, you know, they must not have been alive following World War II and the Cold War.

The domain is protected by Whois privacy, but historical records show the last known owner is a domain name investor. It’s a parked domain name with ads for baby stuff.

Also on the wire

Other reporting from the domain desk.

APolicy & LawAnd WIPO can’t comply with WHOIS, who can? — If ICANNOversee.net Trademark Attempt RejectedPolicy & LawOversee.net Trademark Attempt RejectedDPolicy & LawDomain Names are Registered with Masked Whois — 15%-25% ofGPolicy & LawGuilty of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking — California ISPFPolicy & LawFrank Schilling gets RDNH winRPolicy & LawReverse Domain Name Hijacking decision in cybersquatting dispute — Apple getsNon-profit tries reverse domain name hijacking — Credit counselingPolicy & LawNon-profit tries reverse domain name hijacking — Credit counselingWPolicy & LawWhat’s the worst that can happen?: TyposquattingPPolicy & LawPty Ltd is a reverse domain name hijacker — ILQ Australia