Reglikedomain industry desk

Of Demand Media’s deal with Donuts — An explanation

SEC filing sheds (some) light on relationship for fresh top level domains.

A lot of fuss has been made regarding the connection between Demand Media and Donuts and the fresh TLD program.

What exactly is the relationship between the two firms? Demand Media’s latest 10-Q, filed today, explains the terms of the agreement:

As part of its initiative to pursue the buyout of gTLD operator rights, the Firm has entered into a gTLD buyout agreement (“gTLD Agreement”) with Donuts Inc. (“Donuts”). The gTLD Agreement provides the Firm with rights to acquire the operating and economic rights to certain gTLDs. These rights are shared equally with Donuts and are associated with specific gTLDs (“Covered gTLDs”) for which Donuts is the applicant under the Fresh gTLD Program. The Firm has the right, but not the obligation, to make further deposits with Donuts in the pursuit of acquisitions of Covered gTLDs, for example as part of the ICANN auction process. The operating and economic rights for each Covered gTLD will be determined through a process whereby the Firm and Donuts each select gTLDs from the pool of Covered gTLDs, with the number of selections available to each party based upon the proportion of the total buyout price of all Covered gTLDs that they funded. Gains on sale of the Firm’s interest in Covered gTLDs will be recognized when realized, while losses will be recognized when deemed probable. Separately, the Firm entered into an agreement to provide certain back-end registry services for gTLD operator rights owned by Donuts for a period of five years commencing from the launch of Donut’s first gTLD. Demand Media is not an investor in Donuts nor involved in any joint venture with Donuts or its affiliates.

Note the last line of the explanation, which may have been added to diffuse any suggestions of a tighter relationship between the firms.

So far Demand has made $18.2 million in capital investment in the fresh TLD program, most of which was paid to Donuts. The firm’s $185,000-per-application fee for its 26 own TLD applications represents less than $5 million of the capital investment.

Demand has by now incurred formation expenses of $4.3 million through the end of March related to fresh TLDs. It expects up to spend an additional $5 to $10 million on formation expenses in 2013.

In a somewhat unrelated note regarding to the firm’s 10-Q, it appears there’s an error in its filing. The filing refers to the cost of .com domains and Verisign’s latest agreement with ICANN. The note in the 10-Q states the fresh agreement allows Verisign to hike prices 7% in four of the six years of the contract. That’s not the case; the prices are fixed for the term. I suspect this information was inserted when the contract was agreed to by ICANN but ahead of the Department of Commerce got involved. It was never updated following the final agreement was inked.

Also on the wire

Other reporting from the domain desk.

Dynadot adds payment plans, counting on expired domainsDomain RegistrarsDynadot adds payment plans, counting on expired domainsBDomain RegistrarsBlake Irving defends domain investors — GoDaddy CEOAfilias Stake for $7.4 Million — Tucows SellsDomain RegistrarsAfilias Stake for $7.4 Million — Tucows SellsDomains adds Afternic integration for sales — GoDaddy CorporateDomain RegistrarsDomains adds Afternic integration for sales — GoDaddy CorporateRolling out a paid discount plan — Uniregistry isDomain RegistrarsRolling out a paid discount plan — Uniregistry isCDomain RegistrarsCNET Surveys Registrars regarding GoDaddy SuspensionResults for “Domain Name” — Top searchDomain RegistrarsResults for “Domain Name” — Top searchProfit fall at Team Internet Group — Revenue andDomain RegistrarsProfit fall at Team Internet Group — Revenue andEuropean domain name market — Understanding theDomain RegistrarsEuropean domain name market — Understanding the