Reglikedomain industry desk

Australian server firm tries reverse domain name hijacking

Australian server firm tries reverse domain name hijacking

WIPO panelist determines that Australian firm filed cybersquatting case in bad faith.

the words "reverse domain name hijacking" in pale yellow type on a black bacground, next to a graphic of a pirate face

An Australian hosting and server business has been found to have engaged in reverse domain name hijacking.

GSL Networks Pty Ltd. operates a business called Streamline Servers that provides gaming servers and other hosting services. It filed a UDRP against the owner of StreamlineServers.com.

The domain owner registered it in 2004, well ahead of the Complainant existed or had any trademarks for the term. While the dates that the Complainant purchased rights are in dispute, they are all following 2004. This means it’s impossible that the domain owner registered the domain to cybersquat on the Complainant’s non-existed right at the time.

World Intellectual Property Organization Panelist Andrew D. S. Lothian wrote:

Bearing all of the above in mind, the Panel is of the view that the Complainant’s failure, or that of its representatives, to carry out basic research into the history of the disputed domain name ahead of resorting to its Complaint under the Policy, together with the representatives’ apparent lack of familiarity with Policy precedent on the relevant issue, places this particular case into RDNH territory. Based on the Respondent’s submissions, the Panel does not doubt that the Respondent has suffered inconvenience and expense, and in this case the Panel determines that the circumstances call for the sanction which is available to it, in terms of paragraph 15(e) of the Rules.

The Panel finds that the Complaint was brought in bad faith and constitutes an abuse of the administrative proceeding.

Dowd & Firm represented the Complainant, and Lewis & Lin, LLC represented the domain name owner.

Also on the wire

Other reporting from the domain desk.