Reglikedomain industry desk

It was a mixed bag: ICANN on Namecheap decision

It was a mixed bag: ICANN on Namecheap decision

Following pointing out that Namecheap didn’t get everything it asked for, ICANN states it’s up to the organization what to do with the decision.

Blue background with a white globe and the word ICANN for Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers

ICANN has published its spin on the Independent Review Panel decision in the complaint brought by Namecheap over removing price caps on legacy top level domains.

Not surprisingly, it points out that Namecheap didn’t get a total victory. But it admits neither did ICANN.

Following explaining what Namecheap didn’t convince the panel of, ICANN stated:

Ultimately, still, the IRP panel found that ICANN’s approval of the 2019 Registry Agreements for .INFO and .ORG without price controls violated the Articles and/or Bylaws in a few ways, counting ICANN was not sufficiently transparent in its decision making, the Board did not, but ought to have made the decision regarding these particular Registry Agreement renewals, and ICANN did not follow procedures for ensuring promotion of the global public interest.

ICANN pointed out that the IRP panel recommended but did not order ICANN’s board to analyze and discuss what next steps to take.

The full panel decision is here (pdf).

Here’s my take on what has happened: ICANN’s staff went into the process of removing price caps on legacy TLDs with the pre-determined decision to remove them. Sure, it went through some of the motions of transparency (e.g., community feedback). But it knew all along it was going to remove them. The organization doesn’t want to be a price regulator.

Now, the panel has pointed out that it ought to have done more. It ought to have been more transparent and actually considered all parties. Instead, it just considered what was in the best interests of ICANN (the organization).

I’m not sure that .org and .info will ever have price caps again. But I think the decision could impact future decisions for .com. If the U.S. government ever removes price caps on .com domains, ICANN will have to be more deliberate in its process.

And I’ll repeat this: with the exception of .com, top level domains don’t really have market power over fresh registrations. But they sure as heck do over renewals. Once you build a site on a domain, the switching costs are enormous.

Also on the wire

Other reporting from the domain desk.

To Z.com, Single Letter .Com Domains Have Been Gamed at the Trademark Office — From A.comPolicy & LawTo Z.com, Single Letter .Com Domains Have Been Gamed at the Trademark Office — From A.comTPolicy & LawThree Registrars Lose ICANN AccreditationSpotify ripping site be taken down — Spotify demandsPolicy & LawSpotify ripping site be taken down — Spotify demandsBPolicy & LawBe careful of suspicious Skype and Facebook messages: WarningInitiative Files US Trademark Application — Popular .MusicPolicy & LawInitiative Files US Trademark Application — Popular .MusicProducts Tries to Take Sentimental Domain Name from Altavista Inventor’s Widow — Viking OfficePolicy & LawProducts Tries to Take Sentimental Domain Name from Altavista Inventor’s Widow — Viking OfficeLPolicy & LawLamar Smith and Howard Coble Letter to ICANN: UpdateTrademark in a domain for comparative advertising — Using aPolicy & LawTrademark in a domain for comparative advertising — Using aMPolicy & LawMan Rolls Dice on Casinos.org: CrapShoot